{"id":10103,"date":"2016-01-26T13:48:26","date_gmt":"2016-01-26T18:48:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tasteyourjuice.com\/wordpress\/?p=10103"},"modified":"2016-03-24T09:34:53","modified_gmt":"2016-03-24T13:34:53","slug":"vaporesso-ccell-testing-is-now-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tasteyourjuice.com\/wordpress\/archives\/10103","title":{"rendered":"VAPORESSO CCELL TESTING IS NOW IN!"},"content":{"rendered":"

The third party testing has been completed on the CCell by Vaporesso<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The results appear to be good, but please keep in mind that I’m not a materials guy so I just pass the information along to you as I get it.\u00a0 There are times when some of these reports are as Greek to me as Dimitris.<\/p>\n

The vendor responsible for the third party test was VaporShark<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It appears what VaporShark\/Enthalpy has done was to vape the CCell coil through a filter and then had that filter tested for particulate matter, or in layman’s terms… bad shit on the filter.\u00a0 Nothing was found.<\/p>\n

From Brandon (VaporShark):<\/p>\n

\n

Hi Phil,<\/p>\n

I sent this in on 12\/3 but they didn’t start the testing until 12\/29. I think there is more to do but Enthalpy has eased my skepticism by saying that if the filter is completely empty, as shown in the report, then there would be very negligible trace elements in the vapor and definitely no particulate. Looks like there may not be an issue according to them. I think more testing should be done on the vapor using HPLC or GCMS but this should help for now.<\/p>\n

Brandon<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Here are the results from Enthalpy:<\/p>\n1215-592<\/a>\n

\"Share<\/a>