{"id":14119,"date":"2016-10-04T16:56:53","date_gmt":"2016-10-04T20:56:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tasteyourjuice.com\/wordpress\/?p=14119"},"modified":"2016-10-04T17:01:14","modified_gmt":"2016-10-04T21:01:14","slug":"brent-stafford-interviews-stanton-glantz-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tasteyourjuice.com\/wordpress\/archives\/14119","title":{"rendered":"BRENT STAFFORD INTERVIEWS STANTON GLANTZ – PART 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here’s part 2 of the Stanton Glantz interview with Brent Stafford from Regulator Watch<\/a>. \u00a0Thanks\u00a0for doing this Brent!<\/p>\n

When Public Health England, the nation\u2019s primary health authority, put these words into print \u201ce-cigarettes are 95% less harmful to your health than normal cigarettes\u201d it sparked celebration in the vaping world and a cascade of controversy amongst public health officials and anti-smoking activists.<\/p>\n

Are e-cigarettes really 95% safer than smoking? Stanton Glantz says no!<\/p>\n

He thinks the 95% number was \u201cmade-up\u201d by a group of people who have financial conflicts of interest and no evidence to backup their claims.<\/p>\n

Tune in for Part 2 of our EXCLUSIVE interview with UCSF professor Stanton Glantz, the world\u2019s most well-known tobacco control activist and the man who beat Big Tobacco in the 1990\u2019s.<\/p>\n

Hear what he thinks of the FDA Deeming Regulations, FDA grandfather clause, cancer risk vs. heart disease risk, the Royal College of Physicians in the UK\u2019s \u201cNicotine without Smoke\u201d report and Public Health England\u2019s 95% less harmful finding. It\u2019s an explosive episode you don\u2019t want to miss\u2014only on RegWatch by RegulatorWatch.com.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n